Skip to content

Featured

Is TSMC Price Hike Threat Even Enforceable?

Is TSMC Price Hike Threat Even Enforceable?

By Bolaji Ojo

What’s at stake:

TSMC may be the world’s biggest chip foundry but, it is in the end, a contractor to even more powerful companies. The likes of Apple will not yield easily to pressures for wafer price increases just to help the foundry offset higher fab costs in the West. With competition stiffening from emerging and established foundries like Intel and Samsung, TSMC looks set to combine tight cost management with renewed appeals to customers for assistance in offsetting higher fab prices on its operations.

The chicken has come home to roost at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (TSMC).

At a huge cost, the world’s No. 1 contract chipmaker is finally becoming a truly global enterprise – with as many as six new fabs planned for sites outside Taiwan – and it hurts. So, TSMC wants customers to soothe its pains by consenting to an unpalatable pricing hike.

“If my customer requests to be in certain areas, then definitely, TSMC and the customer have to share the incremental cost,” said C.C. Wei, CEO at TSMC, while presenting the company’s first quarter earnings results last week.

How exactly will this work?

Read More »Is TSMC Price Hike Threat Even Enforceable?
AI: Should I Be Faithful or Agnostic?

AI: Should I Be Faithful or Agnostic?

By Junko Yoshida

Artificial intelligence is progressing at a pace that would make Gordon Moore dizzy.

Pick any headline. From the unveiling of Nvidia’s Blackwell platform, supposedly heralding the arrival of trillion-parameter-scale AI models, to Open AI’s highly anticipated release of Chat GPT 5 (mid-2024) and Elon Musk’s latest Tesla robotaxi iteration (to be unveiled on August 8), we are swept into a barrage of promises and proclamations of the progress of artificial intelligence technologies.

Read More »AI: Should I Be Faithful or Agnostic?
Intel and ASML sprint toward a high-NA future

Intel and ASML Sprint Toward a High-NA Future

By Ron Wilson

What’s at stake:
Intel has bet its chance to catch TSMC at the 1.4 nm node on being the first user of high-NA EUV lithography. It is a short road full of challenges, but early results look promising.

Lithography giant ASML announced this month that they have successfully printed a dense line pattern with 10 nm spacing, using the world’s first production high-NA EUV lithography system. In itself this is just another milestone in a long development schedule for ASML — similar patterns have already been printed using laboratory equipment. But in the global competition between Intel and TSMC for Angstrom-era semiconductor dominance, the announcement looms across the horizon like the first hints of dawn.

Read More »Intel and ASML Sprint Toward a High-NA Future
Embedded Quest at Nuremberg

Embedded Quest at Nuremberg

We cornered engineers and executives at various companies at Embedded World, and asked their perception of the state of the embedded market and what they see must be solved.

Who Wants Rapidus in Silicon Valley?

Who Wants Rapidus in Silicon Valley?

By Junko Yoshida

What’s at stake:
A lot rides on Japan’s first and only foundry company. Rapidus recently received an additional $3.9 billion in government aid. Included in the subsidies are a package that will help Rapidus grow into developing back-end packaging – in a country where no OSAT companies exist. Rapidus has yet to prove its 2nm process technology for front–end volume chip production. Is it trying to do too much?

Many factors contributed to the eventual downfall of the Japanese semiconductor industry. The Japanese industry languished in the1990s largely because of the prolonged US-Japan semiconductor trade war. A mixture of hubris and obsession drove Japan’s pursuit of higher quality DRAMs, while paying little attention to the demand by PC manufacturers looking for “good enough” memory. (Japan missed the tide of a growing PC market.) Finally, Japan, which dominated the global semiconductor market in the ’80s with DRAMs – Japan’s specialty then – never succeeded in converting its technology prowess to microprocessors and logic devices. 

Since then, the lessons Japanese government and semiconductor executives have learned could influence the outcome of Japan’s “renaissance” in chip manufacturing

Read More »Who Wants Rapidus in Silicon Valley?
US Semiconductor Hegemony is Real and Unassailable

US Semiconductor Hegemony is Real and Unassailable

By Bolaji Ojo

What’s at stake:

To succeed as a chipmaker, it would be foolish to ignore America’s government. It has always had a chokehold on the IC business globally; only companies and countries endorsed by America can operate unhindered in the market. The CHIPS Act and the revival of local manufacturing will help extend America’s hegemony for many more years.

No semiconductor manufacturer – wherever located and irrespective of ownership – is independent of the United States’ government .

This has been the case from the beginning of the industry and through its several evolutions. It did not change when captive chip businesses were spun off by OEMs or through the advent of foundries, fabless vendors and the shift of semiconductor production to different parts of Asia.

A new era of American hegemony is upon us, fostered by efforts to reignite local chip production. Other nations and regional bodies, including China, Japan, Korea and the EU, are trying to claw back some authority over the market but their success will still be primarily determined by America, according to observers.

Read More »US Semiconductor Hegemony is Real and Unassailable
smart vs useful

Smart vs. Useful

By Junko Yoshida

What’s at stake:
Companies need to stop applying the shopworn adjective “smart” to every new chip, system, apps or high-tech gadget. Instead of smart for smart’s sake, how about we focus on “useful” for the user’s sake?

New devices are almost inevitably “smart” in the eyes of their inventors, but are the rest of us too dumb to appreciate them? Or maybe the problem is not “us” at all? These are questions the market – investors, partners, developers, system designers, users and consumers – should be asking.  

For too long, the tech industry has been heralding anything new they pump into the market “smart.” What I see too often, however, is  “smartwashing,” using claims of smartness to mask the complexities of implementing the technology and to dismiss challenges that the technology imposes on developers and users.

If smart stuff don’t perform like clockwork all the time, the alibi goes, well, the system designers messed up. Or it was consumers who didn’t read the fine print in the users manual.

Read More »Smart vs. Useful