By Bolaji Ojo

What’s at stake:

Patrick Gelsinger’s tenure as CEO is behind Intel Corp.. For his successor, Lip-Bu Tan, though, a review and study of his predecessor’s actions, successes and missteps could be instructive. Avoiding Gelsinger’s errors – in targets set for himself and employees as well as promises to investors and workers – can help Tan avoid Gelsinger’s fate, which would plunge Intel into a hole it cannot recover from.

Today is Lip-Bu Tan’s second day at Intel Corp. as CEO. He should be under no illusions about the task he has accepted and what the main charge from the board of directors would have been: to raise Intel’s market value.

If Intel didn’t state it so clearly while considering Tan for the job, the semiconductor industry veteran would surely have deduced this himself from his immediate predecessor’s fate.

Many analysts and observers, including the Ojo-Yoshida Report earlier this week, have raised the question of whether the new CEO should keep Intel intact or spin off the foundry operation. The subject is important, but it must represent only a minor factor, considered only as a first step towards the achievement of a grander and more relevant objective, which is that the market must like Tan’s actions enough to respond by elevating the company’s market capitalization.

Read More »Intel may not Survive Another Bad CEO Verdict

By Bolaji Ojo

What’s at stake:

TSMC says it will add more fabs in the United States, deviating further from its Taiwan-centric manufacturing strategy. It caved to pressures from American president Donald Trump, accepting that its business is mired in the bog of geopolitics and nationalism. This shift in the company’s standard operating system will come at a price, the possible loss of some operational efficiencies, for example. Is TSMC willing to pay this price or is it just attempting to deflect criticisms from Donald Trump?

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (TSMC) was pandering to America’s cantankerous president. It was dissembling, too, despite – finally – making diplomatic moves to appease a powerful and unrelenting foe.

Everyone knew this, but most comments on TSMC’s March 3 announcement that it will more than double US capital expenditure were positive, applauding the foundry and touting the brilliance of a move hardly anyone had predicted or even thought reasonable weeks earlier.

The setting of the announcement itself should have raised red flags. At the White House, Donald Trump, accompanied by TSMC CEO CC Wei, said the Taiwan-based company would increase the number of semiconductor fabs it is building in the United States by 5, at a cost of $100 billion. This would bring the total of its latest capex investment in the country to $165 billion, Wei said. He then proceeded to thank Mr. Trump “again for his support.”

Read More »TSMC adds Diplomacy to its Chip Strategy, but at What Cost?

Electronics makers have entered a baffling Twilight Zone where deep structural changes to the old rules by Donald Trump will scuttle many of their investment decisions and plans.

By Mike Markowitz

Trust.

It is the Cornerstone of Business, Geopolitics, and Global Stability.

In commerce, geopolitics, and everyday life, trust is the invisible currency that underpins all relationships. It must be painstakingly built over years, sometimes decades, through consistent actions, adherence to commitments, and a mutual understanding of facts and the belief that agreements, policies, and expectations will not be arbitrarily upended. Yet, trust is uniquely fragile — it can be shattered in an instant by an act of bad faith, policy reversals, or unpredictability in governance. Today, we find ourselves in an era where that trust is being tested like never before.

The Value of Trust in Business

For senior executives in the electronics industry, trust is not just a philosophical concept; it is the bedrock of operations, investments, and supply chains. Companies rely on a stable regulatory environment, enforceable contracts, and predictable market conditions. Businesses make capital investments based on long-term projections of policies, taxation, and trade agreements. Without trust in these foundational elements, decision-making becomes fraught with uncertainty, increasing risk and reducing innovation.

Read More »What’s Cooking at OYR (and at my house): A Growing Trust Deficit

By Peter Clarke

What’s at Stake:

STMicroelectronics’ persistent focus on sustainability matters because the stakes have never been higher. Once-rare “100-year” weather events now occur with alarming frequency, while global climate policy swings — such as the U.S. repeatedly joining, withdrawing from, and re-joining the Paris Agreement — create uncertainty for businesses trying to plan for a low-carbon future. By staying committed to long-term environmental responsibility despite financial and market fluctuations, ST sets an example of corporate resilience in an era where short-term thinking could have catastrophic consequences.

In November 2000, I attended STMicroelectronics’ traditional customer and media party at the Bayerischer Hof hotel in Munich during the Electronica exhibition. As the evening unfolded, I was unexpectedly offered a 10-minute interview with the company’s CEO, Pasquale Pistorio.

Notebook in hand, I was escorted to an executive suite. There, in subdued lighting, sat the great man. At the time, ST – born from the merger of Italy’s SGS and France’s Thomson – was thriving. The company was led by Pistorio, who was widely recognized as one of the most engaging and affable executives in the semiconductor industry.

On this occasion, however, Pistorio was in an uncharacteristically sombre mood. Surprisingly, rather than discussing technology, products, or ST’s impressive business growth, Pistorio wanted to talk about something different. It was a topic rarely reported on: Sustainability.

Read More »ST and the Persistence of a Green Legacy

By Bolaji Ojo

What’s at stake:

STMicroelectronics has had an interim revenue goal of $20 billion in focus for some time. It had hoped to reach this number quickly after clocking record sales of $17.3 billion in 2023. The company concedes this objective may not be achievable until the end of the decade due to a drastic sales slump in 2024 and amidst fears this will continue at least through 2025. What will happen to manufacturing plans, capex, R&D, and the workforce as the company struggles to climb back uphill?

STMicroelectronics NV had its plans nicely laid out. It was going to become a $20 billion semiconductor behemoth by mid-decade and march aggressively towards even higher revenue, larger operating margins, and much fatter profits by 2030.

Halfway through the decade, though, ST’s management, bewildered, is headed back to the drawing board. The lofty plans are in tatters, shredded by massive disruptions in several key markets, including automotive, its largest segment, industrial and personal electronics. The disruptions have forced ST to push out the timeline for its $20 billion revenue goal to 2030, a target that even now appears doubtful.

How Europe’s second-largest semiconductor company navigates its way through the debris of its shattered ambitions over the next years will determine whether it will be anywhere close to its sales and margins objectives by the end of the decade. Manufacturing plans, R&D, capital expenditure, product development, investments, and product portfolios must be overhauled, some even pruned. Expansion goals for new markets may have to be curtailed due to reduced cash flow and some senior executives may be shown the door, their briefs merged with those of survivors’.

Read More »Whither STMicroelectronics after Annus Horribilis?

Jochen Hanebeck of lnfineon is pointing out a dangerous anti-democracy and anti-immigrant tilt in our world. His call for the protection of fundamental human rights globally is critical and earns our full support.